Home - Car Reviews - 2008 Chrysler Sebring Limited Convertible vs. 2008 Pontiac G6 Convertible Comparison Test
2008 Chrysler Sebring Limited Convertible vs. 2008 Pontiac G6 Convertible Comparison Test
| AUTO FINANCE | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Car Review Tools | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Two of America's most advanced convertibles face off. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
Nowadays, folding hardtop convertibles aren't just exclusivities to the performance coupe and high-end luxury cars as they once were. Brands
![]() |
| Pontiac was first to market with a four-seat folding hardtop roof - is it still the one to have? (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
Being that folding hardtop convertibles are extravagant feats of engineering, we've assembled the top of the line versions of these two vehicles for a dueling shootout. They're both similar in that they feature four seats, powerful V6 engines, automatic gearboxes and interiors fitted with leather-trimmed seats and other goodies.
That said, which one of these two American hardtop drop-tops reigns supreme?
Chrysler Sebring Limited
For four years running from 2001 through 2005, the Chrysler Sebring was the
![]() |
| Chrysler's Sebring looks better as a convertible than it does as a sedan; the balance of the longer back end helps. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
Chrysler took a lot of flack (a lot) when it launched the Sebring, mostly because of its unorthodox styling. The sedan model transformed from a low and slender cab-forward machine to something rounder, more bulbous and infused with retro cues. We personally didn't mind its Crossfire-inspired front end with large, wraparound headlamps and hood strakes, and still don't, but the stumpy, truncated tail is another matter. That's the key difference between the Sebring Sedan and the
![]() |
| Three sections make the Sebring roof more compact, thereby making it friendlier to rear-seat occupants and the cargo area. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
The Sebring's roof was designed by Karmann, just like the G6's retractable hardtop, but it differs in one important way – it features three pieces instead of two. The difference between two and three might be one number, but it's so much more than that in terms of what it offers. With three pieces, the roof not only consumes less trunk space when folded away, it also provides better interior accommodations in the form of more headroom. Combined with its boat's deck rear end, there's literally acres of space when the roof is up, with its trunk capable of swallowing multiple sets of golf clubs or what-have-you of similar size. When the roof is down, much of the trunk is still accessible under a hard separator. The only down side to the double-hinged roof is that it requires a forceful slam to get it shut. Important for its four-seat convertible status, the Sebring also offers better rear seat accommodations than the G6.
![]() |
| Chrysler made a concerted effort to make the Sebring feel luxurious. Nav system is great; seats are very flat. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
Our Limited's lavish array of features also helped to pull things in the Sebring's favor. While both cars have keyless starters, the roof can be lowered remotely via the Sebring's keyfob. We also can hardly forget to mention the heated and cooled cupholder, or the MyGig infotainment navigation system with hard drive and live traffic updates. A navigation system or Bluetooth handsfree isn't even available on the G6.
Take it easy. That's the message that the car gives you when you get behind the wheel. Although the 3.5-liter DOHC V6 engine makes more power than the G6, it really makes use of its six-speed automatic. You'll find that despite the high-revving characteristic of the engine, that it's happier to take its sweet time. The seats are flat, and when trimmed in Royale leather, are slippery, making sporty driving less appealing still.
The chassis is designed to do nothing but understeer with early intervention of ESP, but you'd really want nothing less on a car whose steering wheel rim is trimmed in fake tortoise shell and sprung in such a way to cosset you up and down country roads. The ride is also very traditional in its American-ness, with a certain floaty character that might evoke memories of an old Imperial Convertible from the '60s.
On the plus side, the Sebring feels rigid and substantial, shaking off scuttle shake, which is something you couldn't say about any convertible from the '60s. We noted a noteworthy difference in handling with the roof up versus down; over long crests, the back end lifts and drops.
Pontiac G6 GT Convertible
Sorry Volvo, the G6 retractable hardtop was first on our soil. These days, however, the G6 isn't
![]() |
| When it comes to fun, the G6 is firmly out in front, especially with the Sport package. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
There is no question about which of the two is the athlete. Even though the G6 has less power and two fewer gears in its automatic transmission, it's always on the ball. The transmission shifts smoothly and is never caught out to lunch when you floor it; the bigger 3.9-liter engine also uses its broad torque band to slingshot the G6 around. It also sounds better than the Sebring, which doesn't really sound like anything at all. Besides being a bit on the large side, the G6's steering wheel communicates a sharpness that's
![]() |
| Two-segment roof was cheaper to develop, but it has shortcomings when extended to a four-seat car like this. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
Not that AC/DC wrote Dirty Deeds Done Cheap for Pontiac, but the G6's roof was designed with a budget in mind. Unlike any other four-seat convertible sold here, it's made out of two pieces instead of three, and there's a price to pay. With only two panels to cover the roof, the windshield was pulled rearwards, which gives the car a sleek look top up or down, but robs those in front of the convertible feeling. While a couple of seconds is unlikely to matter to occupants, it's a fact that the roof on the G6 is slower up or down than it is on the Sebring. The roof also eats up a considerable amount of trunk space, dropping cargo space from 12.8 cubic feet when the roof is up to a laughable 2.2 cubic feet when it's down. Furthermore, it can't be accessed while
![]() |
| Trunk space is negligible when the roof is down; only small, shallow items fit, even when the roof is up. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
The main problem with this car is that it's not remotely rigid. We don't recommend you do this, but if curiosity gets the best of you try driving around with your index finger in one of the exterior's body panels, or if you're a passenger, fixate your eyes on the lower center console. You'll certainly feel the lack of rigidity, and pain in your finger as the whole car twists when it encounters uneven surfaces to a point where we found it impossible to ignore. Worse yet, it's not just the scuttle that shakes about, the steering wheel, dash, and header all oscillate at different frequencies, a sign that there's insufficient reinforcement underneath. While our tester was fairly free of creaks and rattles, you can bet that five years down the road it's going to have some. Such is the problem of having a convertible with a very long wheelbase. Roof up, however, the G6 is fine; its driving manners improve significantly as it's nowhere near as floppy.
Conclusion
Both the G6 and the Sebring weren't brought to market as sports cars. They were
![]() |
| There are simply too many flaws in the G6 to allow it to win against the softer Sebring. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
There's quite a bit to like about the G6. It's a good looking machine, especially with its top down. We like the Pontiac's eager attitude towards driving too, particularly how it was able to entertain without compromising its levels of comfort. At the same time, it has far too many flaws to capture the victory here. The amount of chassis flex is disconcerting, not just for a car at its reasonable price, but in general. Although the G6 offers seating for four in comfort, when the top is down, there's practically no luggage space,
![]() |
| Useable rain, shine and everything in between. (Photo: Justin Couture, American Auto Press) |
The Sebring is by default the victor, but it doesn't go on with a completely clean bill of health. This Chrysler, though one of the least sporty vehicles we've ever driven (full stop), does have its merits. Here is a four-seat convertible that you could theoretically use every day, just like the Sebring sedan. It has ample of room, rates highly for comfort and has cargo space with the roof up, or down. Chrysler has put more of an effort into bringing a sense of occasion to the Sebring's cabin as well, with a two-toned interior and various trim materials, making it a nicer place to spend time in. But when you break it down, it is the Sebring's roof design and the fact that it feels vastly more solid that allows it to earn its victory. It's the car to own if you want to feel like you're on permanent vacation.
AUTOMOBILE REVIEWS BY MAKE
| • Acura • Alfa Romeo • Ariel • Aston Martin • Audi • Bentley • BMW • Buick • Cadillac • Campagna • Caparo • Chery | • Chevrolet • Chrysler • Dodge • Ferrari • Ford • GMC • Honda • Hummer • Hyundai • Infiniti • International • Jaguar | • Jeep • Kia • Koenigsegg • Lamborghini • Land Rover • Lexus • Lincoln • Lotus • Maserati • Maybach • Mazda • Mercedes | • Mercury • Mini • Mitsubishi • Morgan • Nissan • Pininfarina • Pontiac • Porsche • Rolls Royce • Saab • Saleen • Saturn | • Scion • smart • Subaru • Suzuki • Toyota • Vanderbrink • Volkswagen • Volvo • Yugo |
Acura Audi
Bentley
BMW
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Daewoo
Dodge
Eagle
Ferrari
Ford
Geo
GMC
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Isuzu
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Lamborghini
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Mazda
Mercedes-Benz
Mercury
MINI
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Oldsmobile
Plymouth
Pontiac
Porsche
Saab
Saturn
Scion
Subaru
Suzuki
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo



















