Home - Car Reviews - 2007 Nissan Quest 3.5S Road Test
2007 Nissan Quest 3.5S Road Test
| AUTO FINANCE | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Car Review Tools | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
To say that Nissans minivan has been poorly received would be an understatement, with so few of them sold that if it werent a minivan it would qualify for exclusive status. When I first tested the 2004 model during its media debut in the summer of 2003 I liked it for the most part, but had a few reservations. The third row required WSM champion Mariusz Pudzianowski levels of strength (or should that be IFSAs top contender Zydrunas Savickas) to pull out of the floor if folded flat, and the DVD changer was inanely positioned under the front passenger seat, which is probably the most inconvenient place possible. Other than digital readouts that were too small and therefore difficult to make out I didnt mind the centrally-mounted instrumentation, although I remember many colleagues grumbling about it. And while the styling was quirky, it was sportier than most minivans and therefore almost respectable.
Nissan hasnt changed the styling much, which is a shame. Not because it looks particularly bad, but because it has been improved so much on
| So rare, if it werent a minivan it might even be considered exclusive. (Photo: Trevor Hofmann, American Auto Press) |
The new 2007 Quest doesnt disappoint when it comes to ride and handling
| Power doors and unrivaled space make minivans the ultimate in versatility. (Photo: Trevor Hofmann, American Auto Press) |
Of course, it only makes sense that 235 horsepower maximized at 5,800 rpm and 240 lb-ft of torque at 4,400 rpm would make the Quest feel athletic, then again its hardly the most powerful in the class; that honor goes to Hyundais impressive new Entourage and Kias near identical Sedona at 244 horsepower and 253 lb-ft of torque apiece, followed closely by Hondas Odyssey with identical horsepower but 3 fewer pound feet of torque. Despite slightly less power, mind you, the Quest feels more exciting to drive, with the drawback of not offering as much comfort (more on that in a minute). Astute readers will notice that the new Quest actually
| New instrument cluster combines with Quests stellar performance for enjoyable driving dynamics. (Photo: Trevor Hofmann, American Auto Press) |
And what about its sport over comfort bias? Dont get me wrong, the Quests big, soft, couch-like seats wont cause any discomfort, unless youre looking for more supportive lower cushions, which unfortunately give way far too easily on their outer edges, and when combined with absolutely no lateral support from the front seatbacks make for a slip-sliding experience during fast corning. This is a shame, because the vans chassis is so capable in the curves and steering response and feedback so unusually good for a minivan that I felt cheated by the seats, which were so incapable of holding me in place that I had to brace myself with the door panel when turning right or armrest when turning left, forcing me to only hold onto the steering wheel with one hand
| Rear seats fold flat, but middle row doesnt. (Photo: Trevor Hofmann, American Auto Press) |
OK, Im reviewing a minivan here. Why all the emphasis on driving dynamics? While talking up its flat-folding third row and semi-folding and/or removable second row, Nissan initially boasted about the vans sporting pretensions, not only with regards to driving dynamics but also with respect to its unconventional, low-slung styling. Being that it doesnt measure up to the Dodge Grand Caravan or Chrysler Town & Country when it comes to seat functionality (the Stow n Go seats are really the class leaders for convenience) or some of its other competitors that offer split folding rear seats among other things, the vans performance is its most compelling attribute. So Nissan, if youre going to make performance one of its most distinctive selling points, please fix the seats so that sporty soccer moms (and dads) can take advantage of all that wonderful grip.
But here I go complaining again. Instead of griping about what could be better, lets not forget about everything that Nissan has done to make this van better than its predecessor.
| New center stack is much better than previous Quest. (Photo: Trevor Hofmann, American Auto Press) |
What else did they do? That ultimately ridiculous under-seat DVD changer has been removed and added to the center stack, about halfway down and in its own lidded bin. Thats more like it, a family friendly DVD player that mom and dad wont be cursing every time Jr. wants to watch Over the Hedge.
Oh, and that horribly heavy third row seat is now much more manageable. Its full-length bench doesnt make it as easy to operate as some of its rivals 50:50 split third rows, but its now possible for a smallish mom to lift it from within its well, and push it into its
| Now thats a useful DVD player. (Photo: Trevor Hofmann, American Auto Press) |
My tester wasnt a full-load model, but rather the kind of minivan most of us would buy. I suppose most people would opt for aluminum wheels, but just the same this models 16-inch steel wheels and sporty looking plastic wheel covers wont offend those on tighter budgets. Interestingly, even though the seats were covered with cloth and this model didnt even include automatic climate control, my Quest had a passenger-side power sliding door (the one on the drivers side was manually operable), a power liftgate, power rear quarter windows and a rear sonar system to aid in parking, among other things. I like this, being that these are the types of options that most minivan buyers cant live without, and therefore should be available as standalone items or in a small bundled package, as was the case with the Quest 3.5S. Strangley, however, when configuring the vehicle on the automakers website, www.nissanusa.com, it showed the price starting at $25,650, but then automatically added in a $350 charge for the fold-away seat package, pushing the total to $26,000. Possibly theres a delete for this feature, although I couldnt find one, but still why not include it in the S trim line as standard equipment rather than force an option on people. This one remains a mystery.
AUTOMOBILE REVIEWS BY MAKE
| • Acura • Alfa Romeo • Ariel • Aston Martin • Audi • Bentley • BMW • Buick • Cadillac • Campagna • Caparo • Chery | • Chevrolet • Chrysler • Dodge • Ferrari • Ford • GMC • Honda • Hummer • Hyundai • Infiniti • International • Jaguar | • Jeep • Kia • Koenigsegg • Lamborghini • Land Rover • Lexus • Lincoln • Lotus • Maserati • Maybach • Mazda • Mercedes | • Mercury • Mini • Mitsubishi • Morgan • Nissan • Pininfarina • Pontiac • Porsche • Rolls Royce • Saab • Saleen • Saturn | • Scion • smart • Subaru • Suzuki • Toyota • Vanderbrink • Volkswagen • Volvo • Yugo |
Acura Audi
Bentley
BMW
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Daewoo
Dodge
Eagle
Ferrari
Ford
Geo
GMC
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Isuzu
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Lamborghini
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Maserati
Mazda
Mercedes-Benz
Mercury
MINI
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Oldsmobile
Plymouth
Pontiac
Porsche
Saab
Saturn
Scion
Subaru
Suzuki
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo









