General Motors to Kill Continually Variable Transmission
| AUTO FINANCE | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Auto News Tools | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
New 6-Speed Automatic to Replace CVT in 2006
In what seems like a move against current trends, General Motors will be terminating its continually variable transmission (CVT) at the end of model year 2005.
For the time being, according to Tom Stephens, group vice president of GM Powertrain, GMs CVT will continue as the automatic transmission choice in all-wheel drive 2005 Saturn VUEs, but before 2006 models arrive it will be dropped. At this time GMs CVT will end production.
With regards to the ION Coupe, a 4-speed automatic transmission will be offered throughout 2006 when it will be
![]() |
| GMs continually variable transmission (CVT) will be dropped before the release of the 2006 Saturn VUE. (Photo: General Motors) |
Is Stephens referring to a version of the upcoming 6-speed automatic expected from the GM-Ford joint venture
![]() |
| The 2006 ION Coupe will feature a new 6-speed automatic transmission that GM is still developing. (Photo: Trevor Hofmann, American Auto Press) |
From a sales floor point of view, it makes sense that GM would axe
![]() |
| The CVT found its way into GM of Europes Opel Astra compact, as well as the Saturn ION Coupe and Saturn VUE compact SUV. (Photo: General Motors) |
![]() |
| The CVT allows the engine to remain in a constant rev range as the vehicle accelerates. (Photo: General Motors) |
How does a CVT work? Without going into too much detail, the CVT allows the engine to remain at a constant rev range as the vehicle accelerates rather than increasing engine revs over repeated intervals between gear changes, manipulating the final drive seamlessly from within the transmission. Just like a snowmobile, you keep going faster just by applying the throttle.
Why would GM invest millions into
![]() |
| To get a leg up on the Japanese competition and their traditional 4- or 5-speed transmissions, GM will be offering a 6-speed automatic in 2006. (Photo: General Motors) |
Just the same the lure of increased fuel economy, improved performance and fewer mechanical parts must have sounded enticing, or the automakers top brass would never have sanctioned its development.
| • Acura • Alfa Romeo • Ariel • Aston Martin • Audi • Bentley • BMW • Buick • Cadillac • Campagna • Caparo • Chery | • Chevrolet • Chrysler • Dodge • Ferrari • Ford • GMC • Honda • Hummer • Hyundai • Infiniti • International • Jaguar | • Jeep • Kia • Koenigsegg • Lamborghini • Land Rover • Lexus • Lincoln • Lotus • Maserati • Maybach • Mazda • Mercedes | • Mercury • Mini • Mitsubishi • Morgan • Nissan • Pininfarina • Pontiac • Porsche • Rolls Royce • Saab • Saleen • Saturn | • Scion • smart • Subaru • Suzuki • Toyota • Vanderbrink • Volkswagen • Volvo • Yugo |













